JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 24, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Miguel Angel Ospina Guzman

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Requerimiento Y En Subsidio Apertura De Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-646/07. La Competencia De La Corporacion Para Asegurar El Cumplimiento De Un Fallo Es Excepcional. En El Caso Concreto, La Competencia Del Juez De Primera Instancia Resulta Suficiente Para Garantizar El Cabal Cumplimiento De Las Ordenes Proferidas Por Esta Sala De Revision. Rechazada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
  • Conocimiento de incidente de desacato y adopción de medidas a que haya lugar
Salas De Revision De La Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar cumplimiento del fallo
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia solicitud de requerimiento y apertura de incidente de desacato en sentencia T-646/07
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de requerimiento y en subsidio de apertura de incidente de desacato, promovida por Miguel Ángel Ospina Guzmán.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR la remisión del escrito de solicitud de requerimiento de cumplimiento y, de ser el caso, de apertura de incidente de desacato, al Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Promiscuo Municipal del Guamo, para que actúe de conformidad con sus competencias.
  4. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.